University of Zenica , Zenica , Bosnia and Herzegovina
Predmet rada je pravna priroda pobijanja dužnikovih pravnih radnji i
zaštita povjerilaca od nesavjesnih dužnika u pravnom prometu Pobijanjem
se pravne radnje dužnika proglašavaju ništavim prema onom povjeriocu
koji je pokrenuo postupak pobijanja što se ne odnosi na ostale povjerioce
prema kojima pravne radnje proizvode pravno dejstvo Institut pobijanja
omogućava povrat u pređašnje stanje i otklanjanje štetnih posljedica
Da bi se mogao pokrenuti postupak pobijanja neophodno je da se ispune
određeni uslovi Dodirne tačke triju pretpostavki - dospjelo potraživanje,
preduzimanje odgovarajuće pravne radnje dužnika i preduzimanje te radnje na štetu povjerioca sačinjavaju osnovne elemente za punovažnost postupka pobijanja Navedeni uslovi moraju biti kumulativno ispunjeni da
bi se stekao pravni osnov pokretanja pobojnih radnji Ukoliko izostane
neki od navedenih elemenata, nema mjesta pobijanju dužnikovih pravnih
radnji Ako je dužnik svoju obavezu koja je predmet ugovornog odnosa
zbog nekih razloga zapostavio, povjerilac ima pravo zahtijevati naplatu
sudskim putem.
The subject of the paper is the purpose and legal nature of rebuttal in nonbankruptcy proceedings and the protection of creditors from unscrupulous
debtors in legal transactions By refutation, the debtors legal actions are
declared null and void against the creditor who initiated the refutation
precedure, which does not apply to other creditors against whom legal
actions produce legal effect The institute of refutation enables a return
to the previous state and elimination of harmful consequences Certaim
conditions must be met in order to initiate the rebuttal procedure The
points of contact of the three assumptions – the due claim, the undertaking
of the appropriate legal action by the debtor and the undertaking of that
action to the detriment of the creditor constitute the basic elements for the
validity of the rebuttal procedure The above – mentioned conditions must
be cumulativelymet in order to obtain a legal basis for initiating combative
actions If any of the above- mentioned elements are missing, there is no
room for refuting the debtor’s legal actions If the debtor has neglected his
obligation which is the subject of the conractual realtionship due to some
reasons, the creditor has the right to demand payment through the court
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonDerivative License.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
