×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

SPORAZUM O PRIZNANJU KRIVNJE

By
Almin Musić
Almin Musić

University of Zenica , Zenica , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

Institut sporazum o priznanju krivnje predstavlja dogovor između
osumnjičenog, odnosno optuženog sa tužiocem o uvjetima priznanja
krivnje za ono djelo za koje se tereti, a koji je kao takav zastupljen u
našem zakonodavstvu Ovaj, uvijek aktualan institut bitno je istražiti zbog njegove sve šire upotrebe u praksi Cilj je ukazati na korisnost ovog
instituta i predstaviti prikupljene podatke o količini upotrebe sporazuma
u praksi na teritorijalnom području Zeničko-dobojskog kantona Riječ je
dakle o institutu koji nije svojstven izvornom bosanskohercegovačkom
krivično-procensom zakonodavstvu Sami institut je djelomično preuzet
iz anglo-saksonskog sistema tj iz pravnog sistema SAD-a tokom reforme
krivičnog zakonodavstva koja je okončana 2003godine Rad istražuje i
analizira historijski razvoj i primjenu ovog instituta u zakonodavstvu prije svega SAD-a te način na koji je ovaj institut prihvaćen u zemljama
evropsko-kontinentalnog pravnog sistema sa posebnim akcentom na bosanskohercegovačko zakonodavstvo Nadalje, u radu su istraženi i prikupljeni statistički podaci koji se odnose na upotrebu ovog instituta na
području Zeničko-dobojskog kantona u slučajevima koje je vodilo Kantonalno tužilastvo Rad istražuje i analizira način nastanka sporazuma kao
takvog, te na koji način je izvršena recepcija ovog instituta na području
Evrope i na koncu kako je zapravo Bosna i Hercegovina preuzela institut
i koji je obim njegove upotrebe, striktno na području Zeničko-dobojskog
kantona

The plea agreement institute represents an arrangement between
the accused or defendant and the prosecutor regarding the conditions of
admitting guilt for the offense they are charged with, as established in our
legislation This institute, which remains relevant, is important to explore
due to its increasingly widespread use in practice The aim is to highlight
the usefulness of this institute and present collected data on the extent of
plea agreement usage in practice within the Zeničko-dobojski canton This
institute is not inherent to the original Bosnian-Herzegovinian criminal
procedural legislation It has been partially adopted from the Anglo-Saxon
system, specifically from the legal system of the USA during the criminal
law reform that concluded in 2003 The paper examines and analyzes the
historical development and application of this institute primarily in US
legislation, as well as how this institute has been accepted in countries with
a European continental legal system, with a particular focus on BosnianHerzegovinian legislation Furthermore, the paper investigates and collects
statistical data related to the use of this institute in the Zeničko-dobojski
canton, in cases handled by the Cantonal Prosecutor’s Office It explores
and analyzes the formation of the plea agreement as such, the reception of
this institute in Europe, and ultimately how Bosnia and Herzegovina has
adopted the institute and the extent of its use specifically in the Zeničkodobojski canton

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonDerivative License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
  3. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.