×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

SUĐENJE NA DALJINU KAO PRETPOSTAVKA VOĐENJA PARNIČNOG POSTUPKA

By
Alaudin Brkić ,
Alaudin Brkić

University of Zenica , Zenica , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Smajo Šabić
Smajo Šabić

University of Zenica , Zenica , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

Način vođenja parničnog postupka uređen je Zakonom o parničnom postupku,
u toku kojeg je propisana obaveza prisustva parničnih stranaka i drugih učesnika
na ročištima u toku parničnog postupka. Razvoj savremenih informacionijh
tehnologija, te nastupanje određenih vanrednih okolnosti, kao što je u skorijem
proteklom periodu bila pojava pandemije uzrokovana virusom COVID-19,
navodi nas na razmišljanje kako obezbijediti parničnim strankama pravo na
pristup sudu, a da pri tome u tradicionalni način vođenja parničnog postupka koji
se zasniva na načelu neposrednosti, načelu javnosti, te načelu kontradiktornosti
budu ugrađena određena digitalna informaciona rješenja koja bi u svakom
pogledu doprinijela ekonomičnijem i funkcionalnijem vođenju parničnog
postupka, a da pri tome ostanu zadržana sva prava parničnih stranaka u pogledu
pristupa sudu. Kroz ovo naučno istraživanje, autori će se baviti istraživanjem
mogućeg načina vođenja sudskog parničnog postupka korištenjem informacionih
video i tonskih tehnologija sa posebnim osvrtom na uporedno pravna rješenja,
s ciljem istraživanja mogućeg organizovanja suđenja bez potrebe fizičkog
prisustva parničnih stranka ili ostalih sudionika u toku postupka, kroz pronalazak
mogući odgovarajućih rješenja koja bi mogla biti ugrađena u buduća zakonska
rješenja, koja bi stvorila pretpostavke za održavanje ročišta na daljinu kao jednog
funkcionalnijeg načina vođenja parničnog postupka.

Traditional way of guidance civil procedure is made of “Law of civil
procedure” where it is written that attendance of everyone included in the case
is mandatory. Development of modern information technologies and having
emergency situation as it was with COVID-19, made us thinking how to provide
litigants access to the court, while at the same time having the traditional way
of conducting litigation, which is based on the principle of immediacy, the
principle of publicity, and the principle of adversariality. All of these principle
should be incorporated with digital information solutions that would contribute
more economically and functionally guidance civil procedure with all rights of
civil retained. Through this scientific research, writer will by researching the
possible way of conducting court litigation using informational videoconference
technologies with a special focus on comparative legal solutions, with the aim of
researching the possible organization of trials without the need for the physical
presence of litigants and other participants during the process, through finding
possible appropriate legal solutions that would create prerequisites for holding
remote hearings as a more functional way of conducting civil proceedings.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonDerivative License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
  3. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.