University of Zenica , Zenica , Bosnia and Herzegovina
U 2023. godini navršilo se dvije decenije od stupanja na snagu entitetskih
zakona o parničnom postupku. Navedeni zakoni donijeti su u sklopu cjelokupnog
programa pravosudne reforme i donijeli su značajne i obimne promjene u odnosu
na ranija rješenja. Reforme parničnog zakonodavstva na entitetskom nivou pratile
su i reforme na državnom nivou i Brčko distriktu BiH, tako da su doneseni novi
zakoni o parničnom postupku u gotovo istovjetnom tekstu.
Cilj tih promjena bio je prvenstveno da se postupak učini što ekonomičnijim
i efikasnijim. Rad će razmotriti postignuća u primjeni postojećih zakona o
parničnom postupku u revizijskoj fazi postupka, obzirom na značajne izmjene u
pogledu uloge entitetskih vrhovnih sudova.
Imajući u vidu da je od stupanja na snagu ovog propisa prošlo dvije decenije,
kao i činjenicu da su to razdoblje obilježili i brojni izazovi u primjeni ovog
zakona, rad je usmjeren i na probleme koje je dosadašnje iskustvo artikuliralo i
mogućih pristupa koja je prema njima moguće zauzeti.
U radu će se posebno analizirati učinci izmjena i dopuna zakona o parničnom
postupku obzirom da je uveden novi procesni institut postupak za rješavanje
spornog pravnog pitanja te su izmijenjene odredbe koje se odnose na izvanrednu
reviziju.
Sadašnje uređenje revizije nije ostvarilo svoj zadatak u osiguranju jedinstvene
primjene prava i ravnopravnosti svih u njegovoj primjeni. Rješenje treba tražiti
u normiranju sadašnje izvanredne revizije kao revizije po dopuštenju gdje bi se
uspostavili kriteriji koji to predmeti zaslužuju da se o njima odluči, a sve u svrhu
ujednačavanja sudske prakse i jedinstvene primjene prava.
In 2023, two decades passed since the entry into force of entity laws on
civil procedure. The aforementioned laws were adopted as part of the overall
judicial reform program and brought significant and extensive changes compared
to earlier solutions. The reforms of the civil legislation at the entity level were
accompanied by the reforms at the state level and the Brčko District of Bosnia
and Herzegovina, so that the new laws on civil procedure were adopted with an
almost identical text.
The primary goal of those changes was to make the procedure as economical
and efficient as possible.
The paper will consider achievements in the application of existing laws on
civil procedure in the review phase of the procedure, considering the significant
changes regarding the role of entity supreme courts.
Bearing in mind that two decades have passed since the entry into force of
this regulation, as well as the fact that that period was also marked by numerous
challenges in the application of this law, this paper is also focused on the problems
articulated by past experience as well as taking possible approaches to solve them.
The paper will specifically analyze the effects of amendments to the law on
civil procedure, considering that a new procedural institute was introduced to
resolve a disputed legal issue, and the provisions related to the extraordinary
audit were changed.
The current regulation of the audit has not achieved its task in ensuring the
uniform application of the law and the equality of all in its application. The solution
should be sought in the standardization of the current extraordinary review as a
review by permission, where criteria would be established which cases deserve
to be decided on, all for the purpose of harmonizing judicial practice and uniform
application of law.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonDerivative License.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.