University of Zenica , Zenica , Bosnia and Herzegovina
University of Zenica , Zenica , Bosnia and Herzegovina
Ocjena i izdvajanje nezakonitih dokaza predstavlja jedno od najkompleksnijih
pitanja u krivičnom postupku. Države evropsko-kontinentalnog pravnog
sistema usvojile su raznolika pravna rješenja u pogledu načina ocjene i sistema
izdvajanja nezakonitih dokaza iz spisa predmeta. Evropski sud za ljudska prava
nema nadležnost da odlučuje o pravnoj upotrebljivosti dokaza u nacionalnim
krivičnim postupcima. Umjesto toga, Evropski sud za ljudska prava na temelju
“holističkog pristupa” in concreto odlučuje da li je nacionalni krivični postupak
u cjelini bio pravičan uzimajući u obzir način pribavljanja i ocjene dokaza.
Rad istražuje i analizira ključna stajališta ovog suda u predmetima koji se tiču
upotrebe i izdavanja nezakonitih dokaza u krivičnim postupcima u nacionalnim
pravnim sistemima. Ključna stajališta strasburškog suda treba da služe kao
putokazi u primjeni nacionalnog prava u državama članicama Vijeća Evrope.
Rad može da posluži kao koristan alat u daljnjem istraživanju usklađenosti
primjene domaćeg prava sa standardima Evropskog suda za ljudska prava.
Admissibility of illegally obtained evidence is one of the most complex
issues in criminal proceedings. European continental legal system countries
have adopted various legal solutions regarding the methods of assessing and
excluding illegal evidence from criminal proceedings. The European Court
of Human Rights does not have jurisdiction to decide on the admissibility
of evidence in national criminal proceedings. Instead, based on a “holistic
approach,” the European Court of Human Rights decides whether the national
criminal proceedings as a whole were fair, taking into account the manner of
obtaining and assessing the evidence. This paper explores and analyzes the key
positions of the court in cases concerning the use of illegally obtained evidence
in national criminal proceedings. The key positions of the European Court of
Human Rights should serve as guidelines in the application of national law
in Council of Europe member states. The paper can serve as a useful tool in
further research on the compatibility of the application of domestic law with
the standards of the European Court of Human Rights.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonDerivative License.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.