University of Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
U radu se prikazuje problem koji se javlja u sudskoj praksi, a to je
proizvoljna primjena materijalnog prava u građanskim sporovima. Naime, sudije
opštinskih sudova u parničnim postupcima pasivno postupaju kada je u pitanju
pravna kvalifikacija tužbenog zahtjeva i o tome odlučuju tek u trenutku
donošenja presude. Uzrok tome su pogrešno tumačenje pojma pravni osnov
tužbenog zahtjeva u Zakonu o parničnom postupku i kasno pravno tumačenje
činjenične građe. U radu se prikazuju i primjeri iz sudske prakse koji se
podvrgavaju kritici. Na kraju se iznose prijedlozi za izmjene zakonskih odredaba
kako bi se utjecalo na ovaj problem i građanima omogućila veća sigurnost u
građanskim sporovima.
The paper presents the problem of arbitrary application of substantive law
in court practice that occurs in civil disputes. Namely, judges of municipal courts
in civil proceedings act passively when it comes to the legal qualification of the
claim and decide on it only at the moment of passing the verdict. The reason for
this is the misinterpretation of the term legal basis of the claim in the Civil
Procedure Act and the late legal interpretation of the facts. The paper also
presents examples from case law that are subject to criticism. Finally, proposals
are made to amend the legal provisions in order to address this problem and
provide citizens with greater security in civil disputes.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.